From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12147 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2002 16:26:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12101 invoked by uid 71); 19 Nov 2002 16:26:04 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021119162604.12094.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: echristo@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Bosscher Steven Civ USAFA/DFAN Subject: Re: optimization/1762: treatment of NaNs violates IEEE 754 Reply-To: Bosscher Steven Civ USAFA/DFAN X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00982.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/1762; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bosscher Steven Civ USAFA/DFAN To: "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'echristo@gcc.gnu.org'", "'reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de'", "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/1762: treatment of NaNs violates IEEE 754 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:25:42 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=1762 This bug doesn't happen for GCC 3.1 and later on my SGI workstation. Maybe time to close the PR? Greetz Steven