From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26921 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2002 02:16:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26827 invoked by uid 71); 20 Nov 2002 02:16:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021120021602.26824.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: David Abrahams Subject: Re: bootstrap/3758: GCC-3.0 doesn't build under cygwin / Bad diagnostic reporting Reply-To: David Abrahams X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg01075.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3758; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Abrahams To: bangerth@dealii.org Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bootstrap/3758: GCC-3.0 doesn't build under cygwin / Bad diagnostic reporting Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:59:10 -0500 bangerth@dealii.org writes: > Synopsis: GCC-3.0 doesn't build under cygwin / Bad diagnostic reporting > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 19 18:02:02 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > This is a rather old bootstrap failure report, and gcc3.0 > is no longer supported. Don't look at me! I reported this Sat Jul 21 10:46:00 PDT 2001! > Can you please check whether you can build a newer version of > gcc on your platform and let us know about your findings? Of course I have built many more recent GCCs on my platform since then. Who could wait 18 months just to get going with GCC 3.x? > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3758 -- David Abrahams dave@boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution