From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27020 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2002 02:16:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26880 invoked by uid 71); 20 Nov 2002 02:16:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021120021604.26877.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: bootstrap/3758: GCC-3.0 doesn't build under cygwin / Bad diagnostic reporting Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg01076.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3758; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: David Abrahams Cc: bangerth@dealii.org, , , , Subject: Re: bootstrap/3758: GCC-3.0 doesn't build under cygwin / Bad diagnostic reporting Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:15:19 -0600 (CST) > > Synopsis: GCC-3.0 doesn't build under cygwin / Bad diagnostic reporting > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > > State-Changed-Why: > > This is a rather old bootstrap failure report, and gcc3.0 > > is no longer supported. > > Don't look at me! I reported this Sat Jul 21 10:46:00 PDT 2001! Don't look at me neither, I am just checking old old reports of which I think 90% can be closed since they no longer apply. I am just pinging people to see what the present state is :-) > > Can you please check whether you can build a newer version of > > gcc on your platform and let us know about your findings? > > Of course I have built many more recent GCCs on my platform since > then. Who could wait 18 months just to get going with GCC 3.x? Thanks for your quick reply! W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth