From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4672 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2002 17:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4656 invoked by uid 71); 20 Nov 2002 17:26:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021120172601.4655.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Rob Savoye Subject: Re: bootstrap/3776: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms Reply-To: Rob Savoye X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg01125.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3776; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rob Savoye To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/3776: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:11:37 -0700 On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:12:54AM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > Old Synopsis: Can't build for sh-hms > New Synopsis: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 19 18:12:53 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > This is a rather old bootstrap failure report, and gcc3.0 > is no longer supported. Can you please check whether you > can build a newer version of gcc on your platform and let > us know about your findings? > > Thanks > W. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3776 Yep, it's fixed in the 3.2 release. This is so old, I forgot about it... In general, the cross development support in 3.2 is way better (and to be expected) than in 3.0. - rob -