From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1749 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2002 02:08:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1706 invoked by uid 61); 21 Nov 2002 02:08:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021121020850.1702.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gniibe@m17n.org, jh@suse.cz, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tm@kloo.net From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gniibe@m17n.org, jh@suse.cz, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tm@kloo.net, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bootstrap/6225: [x86 x sh-elf] reload1.c failure X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg01157.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: reload1.c failure for sh-elf. Bootstrap failure on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu New Synopsis: [x86 x sh-elf] reload1.c failure State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 20 18:08:49 2002 State-Changed-Why: This is a rather old bootstrap failure. Can you please check whether this still happens with newer versions of gcc and report back to us what you find? Has the patch you mention in your report been applied in the meantime? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6225