From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16811 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2002 20:30:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16792 invoked by uid 61); 2 Dec 2002 20:30:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 12:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021202203006.16791.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: andrew-message@ccl.bham.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, andrew-message@ccl.bham.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8766: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed initialisation of static template variable X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: cc1plus segfaults after failed initialisation of static template variable New Synopsis: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed initialisation of static template variable State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 2 12:30:06 2002 State-Changed-Why: I can confirm this. It is a regression of present 3.2 branch vs 3.2.0. Too bad :-( The symptom on my machine is that it enters a memory eating loop and only dies if it is killed or runs out of memory. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8766