From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17888 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2002 21:14:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17868 invoked by uid 61); 2 Dec 2002 21:14:53 -0000 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021202211453.17867.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jjaimon@novell.com, jjaimon@yahoo.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jjaimon@novell.com, jjaimon@yahoo.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/8375: Constraints on inline assembly X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: Problems with inline assemble in gcc-3.2 New Synopsis: Constraints on inline assembly State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 2 13:14:52 2002 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed in the sense that I get the same message and that it worked in 2.95. I don't know whether the code is legal or not. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8375