From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22188 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2002 21:21:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22159 invoked by uid 61); 2 Dec 2002 21:21:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021202212131.22158.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kipp@sgl.crestech.ca, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kipp@sgl.crestech.ca, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/8290: [3.2/3.3 regression] Initialization with compound literals during declaration fails with gcc 3.2 X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: Initialization with compound literals during declaration fails with gcc 3.2 New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3 regression] Initialization with compound literals during declaration fails with gcc 3.2 State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 2 13:21:29 2002 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. Assuming the code is legal, it is a regression from 3.0, which compiled it fine. A simpler code is this: ----------------------------- typedef struct { int a; } s; s w[2] = (s []) { { 1 }, { 2 } }; int main(void) { s x[2] = (s []) { { 1 }, { 2 } }; return(0); } ------------------------------- http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8290