From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7463 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2002 20:44:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7433 invoked by uid 61); 3 Dec 2002 20:44:32 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021203204432.7432.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sunil.k.davasam@intel.com From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sunil.k.davasam@intel.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8684: ABI Issue: gcc3.2 is not reusing tail-padding.. X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: ABI Issue: gcc3.2 is not reusing tail-padding.. Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Dec 3 12:44:29 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: The person who probably knows the most about this part of the standard State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 3 12:44:29 2002 State-Changed-Why: Yes, this is wicked. gcc 2.95, 3.2, 3.2.2 and 3.3 do indeed not reuse the tail padding in this example; it does also not matter whether I specifiy -fabi-version=0 or 1 or 2. Also, icc6.0 does not. But gcc3.0.4 and icc7 do! I don't know what the standard says, but it seems like worth someone knowledgable check this. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8684