From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13096 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2002 23:04:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13077 invoked by uid 61); 3 Dec 2002 23:04:33 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 15:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021203230433.13076.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: middle-end/7796: [3.3 regression]: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 extra failure w/-m64 on execute/930921-1.c in unroll.c X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.3 regression]: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 extra failure w/-m64 on execute/930921-1.c in unroll.c State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 3 15:04:32 2002 State-Changed-Why: Kaveh, is this still imminent? If it's a regression, we should mark it as "high"... http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7796