From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-25675-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5895 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 14:46:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5837 invoked by uid 71); 4 Dec 2002 14:46:07 -0000
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 06:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021204144607.5836.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/8806: gcc accepts bad argument for template template parameter
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8806; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
   Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>, <catherin@ca.ibm.com>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8806: gcc accepts bad argument for template template parameter
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 08:36:05 -0600 (CST)

 This is actually kind of a funny problem (an oversight in the standard?),
 and the only way I can think of to make this go the intended way would be
 to write
   foo< ::bar>
 or maybe
   foo<template bar>
 
 The first is accepted by newer compilers, the latter is
 not.
 
 Regards
   Wolfgang
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:           bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth