From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8223 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 15:43:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8203 invoked by uid 61); 4 Dec 2002 15:43:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 07:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021204154332.8202.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, saito@densan.co.jp From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, saito@densan.co.jp, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: middle-end/4154: copy a structure argument with negative length (gcc3.0.1 mips3) X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: copy a structure argument with negative length (gcc3.0.1 mips3) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 4 07:43:31 2002 State-Changed-Why: I can see that a similar patch to the one you proposed has been applied some two weeks after your report. The ChangeLog entry is this one: revision 1.199 date: 2001/09/10 10:10:16; author: rsandifo; state: Exp; lines: +4 -2 * calls.c (store_one_arg): Make sure that the entire argument is pushed if STACK_PARMS_IN_REG_PARM_AREA is defined. Can you verify whether this fixes your problem with gcc3.2? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4154