From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28948 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 20:09:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28919 invoked by uid 61); 5 Dec 2002 20:09:13 -0000 Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 12:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021205200913.28918.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: debug/1621: Debugging with complex numbers X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Debugging with complex numbers State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Thu Dec 5 12:09:13 2002 State-Changed-Why: Joseph, this report is now almost 2 years old, and versions 3.0 and 3.1/2 have happened in between. Unfortunately, there are no testcases in the report, so I can't check the claims myself, but do you know whether the situation has or has not improved in the meantime? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1621