From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-25771-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7719 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 20:25:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7697 invoked by uid 61); 5 Dec 2002 20:25:30 -0000
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 12:25:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021205202530.7696.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gin@mo.msk.ru,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gin@mo.msk.ru, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: other/3409: configure objdump
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: configure objdump

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Thu Dec  5 12:25:29 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    The report does not state against which version of gcc the
    report is. However, just by inspection of the configure
    script, it seems like objdump is treated in the same
    way as many other variables. Could you possibly check
    whether the problem still exists with present gcc versions,
    for example 3.2.1?
    
    Thanks
      Wolfgang

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3409