From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-25779-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11077 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 21:32:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11048 invoked by uid 61); 5 Dec 2002 21:32:37 -0000
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021205213237.11047.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gypsy@Media.mit.edu,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gypsy@Media.mit.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/7509: gcc 3.1.1 bootstrap fails in stage2
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: gcc 3.1.1 bootstrap fails in stage2

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Thu Dec  5 13:32:37 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Based on the following mail, I close all except 6680.
    
    Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:54:36 +0100
    From: Emmanuel Thomé <thome@lix.polytechnique.fr>
    To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
    Subject: Re: ICE/bootstrap alpha*-dec-osf5.0
    
    
    OK, I'll contact the persons you mention.
    
    > > P.S: Perhaps most if not all of these PR's could be collapsed to a
    > > single one ?
    > > [...]
    > 
    > Oh yes, I would be happy to do this. Can you indicate which of these I can
    > close and which other report I should reference in the closing message?
    > The bug database has become so large that it has become nearly unusable,
    > and it is really necessary to reduce same cases to only one
    > representative.
    
    Then I'm 100% sure that PRs # 6680, 6766, 7509, 7626, 7747, 7777, 8452, 6796
    are duplicates of the same bug. The six other PRs I mention in my mail
    might be related to the same issue, but that's unclear.
    
    So this makes for 8 PRs that you can collapse into a single one ! None
    of them is significantly more accurate than the others, so picking a
    random one would do. Perhaps the one PR that you keep should include a
    reference to the ones that have been closed.
    
    Greetings,
    
    E.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7509