From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31186 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2002 21:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31157 invoked by uid 71); 6 Dec 2002 21:16:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 13:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021206211601.31156.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Kyle Lanclos Subject: Re: optimization/7778: Internal compiler error in reload_cse_simplify_operands Reply-To: Kyle Lanclos X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/7778; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kyle Lanclos To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/7778: Internal compiler error in reload_cse_simplify_operands Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:10:19 -0800 You wrote: > Do you still have the sources and can reproduce the error? > We would need the preprocessed source file... There's no way I can pick out from the mozilla source code which file(s) are necessary to reproduce the bug. As much as I hate the presentation, all I have is a tarball of my build tree. http://www.ucolick.org/~lanclos/gcc/ I apologize sincerely at my lack of a concise method of reproducing the error. > By the way, are you absolutely sure that you are using > gcc3.2 for your compilation (check with gcc -v)? Yes, though I'm not using gcc 3.2.1, and I have not tried building the most recent mozilla source code. > The output upon the internal error does not mention the > gcc web page, which it should with 3.2... I may have omitted that portion of the error message in my report. --Kyle