From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31319 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2002 21:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31291 invoked by uid 61); 6 Dec 2002 21:16:08 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 13:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021206211608.31290.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, torek@bsdi.com From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, torek@bsdi.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/7690: gcc 2.95.3: argument destroyed under -O2 on IA32 X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00388.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: gcc 2.95.3: argument destroyed under -O2 on IA32 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 6 13:16:07 2002 State-Changed-Why: gcc2.95 is a rather old release and is no longer maintained Could you possibly check, whether the same problem happens with newer versions of gcc? I tried to play a little with your testcase, but was not able to reproduce it. Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7690