From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10301 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2002 21:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10278 invoked by uid 61); 6 Dec 2002 21:30:07 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 13:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021206213007.10277.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, giffordj@linkline.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, giffordj@linkline.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/7449: extract_insn X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: extract_insn State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 6 13:30:06 2002 State-Changed-Why: There is no preprocessed source in the report. Could you please provide it? However, it may be that the same holds as for the other report of yours that I just closed, namely that it is the same problem and that the patches have been applied in the meantime. It would be great if you could check this with a newer version of gcc. Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7449