From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13890 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2002 22:00:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13867 invoked by uid 61); 6 Dec 2002 22:00:52 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 14:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021206220052.13866.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, spigel@olvs.miee.ru From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, spigel@olvs.miee.ru, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6975: reload1.c verify_initial_elim_offsets X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00406.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: reload1.c verify_initial_elim_offsets State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 6 14:00:51 2002 State-Changed-Why: The code compiles just fine for me, with the final 3.2 release, and 3.2.2pre. Could you possibly check whether this also holds for your system? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6975