From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18951 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2002 00:08:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18928 invoked by uid 61); 7 Dec 2002 00:08:22 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021207000822.18927.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, user42@zip.com.au From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, user42@zip.com.au, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6162: [3.2/3.3 regression] certain i386 asm reloader ice X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00427.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: gcc 3.0.4: certain i386 asm reloader ice New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3 regression] certain i386 asm reloader ice State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 6 16:08:21 2002 State-Changed-Why: Re-confirmed. This had already been marked as "high" before 3.2.1, but had then be downgraded to not hold up the release. It still happens. I change the synopsis of the report to indicate that it is a regression, and re-set it to "high" to force a reevaluation. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6162