From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-25939-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20975 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2002 21:40:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20956 invoked by uid 61); 8 Dec 2002 21:40:21 -0000
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 13:40:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021208214021.20955.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  s.chauveau@chello.nl
From: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Reply-To: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, s.chauveau@chello.nl,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/8872: Constant propagation and conditional statements
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00468.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: Constant propagation and conditional statements

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: reichelt
State-Changed-When: Sun Dec  8 13:40:21 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Fixed in mainline.
    
    With gcc 3.3-20021118 I get the following assembler output,
    when optimizing with -O2:
    
    foo:
    	pushl	%ebp
    	movl	$1, %eax
    	movl	%esp, %ebp
    	popl	%ebp
    	ret
    
    That's what you expected, right?
    
    Since the bad optimization in gcc 3.2.1 is no regression,
    the fix will most likely not be backported for gcc 3.2.2.
    
    But thanks for spotting this problem.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8872