From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15508 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 22:14:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15453 invoked by uid 61); 9 Dec 2002 22:14:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 14:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021209221422.15451.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: 25824@bugs.debian.org, cpbs@debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de Reply-To: ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de, 25824@bugs.debian.org, cpbs@debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/6903: gcc could give better error message when /tmp gets full X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00496.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: gcc could give better error message when /tmp gets full State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: cae State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 9 14:14:21 2002 State-Changed-Why: As Zack pointed out there's not much that gcc can do about this. Any objections if I close this one? regards Christian http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6903