From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24258 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 23:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24242 invoked by uid 71); 9 Dec 2002 23:26:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021209232601.24241.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: preprocessor/7263: __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants Reply-To: "Joseph S. Myers" X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00501.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/7263; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: , , , Cc: Subject: Re: preprocessor/7263: __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 23:24:53 +0000 (GMT) On 9 Dec 2002 ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de wrote: > Synopsis: __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > State-Changed-By: cae > State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 9 15:10:17 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > I can confirm this on recent 3.3. The warning is from the preprocessor > where we don't know about __extension__. Maybe the fix is to just > document this. Anyway: Category changed to preprocessor and priority > raised to medium because this is technically a regression. Note the same issue applies with the warning for complex floats; since __extension__ is there used by glibc's to define _Complex_I, some fix involving not warning for such constants arising from macros defined in system headers may be necessary. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk