From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16700 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2002 08:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16685 invoked by uid 71); 10 Dec 2002 08:26:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021210082601.16684.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Glen Nakamura Subject: Re: optimization/8634: [3.2/3.3 regression] incorrect code for inlining of memcpy under -O2 Reply-To: Glen Nakamura X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8634; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Glen Nakamura To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/8634: [3.2/3.3 regression] incorrect code for inlining of memcpy under -O2 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 22:20:00 -1000 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8634 Additional analysis of the problem and work-around patch posted at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-12/msg00533.html GCC developers with more experience should decide whether or not const initializers should be flagged as RTX_UNCHANGING, and if so then the cases that generate multiple sets need to be fixed... - glen