From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-26012-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17899 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2002 12:16:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17780 invoked by uid 71); 10 Dec 2002 12:16:16 -0000
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 04:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021210121616.17755.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
Subject: Re: other/3782: -fstats produces a segmentation fault
Reply-To: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00541.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR other/3782; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
To: Sylvain Pion <Sylvain.Pion@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: other/3782: -fstats produces a segmentation fault
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:15:39 +0100

 On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:16:31PM +0100, Sylvain Pion wrote:
 > >     Does this still happen with your setup?
 > 
 > Yes it does.  With current mainline, I get :
 
 Thanks for the feedback. I only tried with gcc not with g++.
 I now can reproduce this, cc1plus segfaults even without ANY
 input file if -quiet and -fstats is passed. This one line patch
 (compiled but not bootstrap tested) fixes the ICE for me, not sure
 if this is the appropriate fix though. Someone please look at this
 and check it in if appropriate.
 
 
 --- gcc/timevar.c.orig	Tue Dec 10 13:01:22 2002
 +++ gcc/timevar.c	Tue Dec 10 13:05:28 2002
 @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@
        timevar_accumulate (elapsed, &tv->start_time, &now);
      }
    /* Or is TIMEVAR at the top of the timer stack?  */
 -  else if (stack->timevar == tv)
 +  else if (stack && stack->timevar == tv)
      {
        get_time (&now);
        timevar_accumulate (elapsed, &start_time, &now);
 
 
     regards   Christian
 
 -- 
 THAT'S ALL FOLKS!