From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20634 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2002 17:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20614 invoked by uid 71); 10 Dec 2002 17:46:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021210174603.20613.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Christian Ehrhardt" Subject: Re: target/7493: [SPRAC] Possible instruction jump too large for assembler. Reply-To: "Christian Ehrhardt" X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/7493; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Christian Ehrhardt" To: Marcus MacWilliam Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/7493: [SPRAC] Possible instruction jump too large for assembler. Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 18:39:22 +0100 On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:28:19PM +0000, Marcus MacWilliam wrote: > I was using gcc v3.1, when the error occured. > The assembler code produced, was contained in the original defect. > The original error message was included in the defect. > The error is there. > > However, we re-wrote the function to be smaller, to get rid of the > problem, so it is not as much of an issue now, as it was then. I'm still interested in a test case for this but unless you're able to provide us with C-Code that triggers the problem noone can help you. Maybe you can invest some time and produce a modified/stipped down version of the original code that still triggers the bug. If you can't provide a test case I'll have to close this report. regards Christian -- THAT'S ALL FOLKS!