From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30071 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2002 01:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30046 invoked by uid 71); 11 Dec 2002 01:16:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021211011601.30045.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Danny Smith Subject: Re: other/5620: [3.1] GCC -save-temps foo.c fails to build foo.o Reply-To: Danny Smith X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00616.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/5620; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Danny Smith To: bangerth@dealii.org, danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: other/5620: [3.1] GCC -save-temps foo.c fails to build foo.o Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 01:04:56 +0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: ; ; ; Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 01:01 Subject: Re: other/5620: [3.1] GCC -save-temps foo.c fails to build foo.o > Synopsis: [3.1] GCC -save-temps foo.c fails to build foo.o > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 10 17:01:11 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > The patch you mention has not been reverted, as far as I can > tell. Can you say whether the problem persists with > present mainline? Yes. The bug is host (mingw) specific and is due to the msvcrt implementation of stat. I have a patch that fixes for host, but have been putting off submitting because it is so ugly I'll work on it. Danny > > Thanks > Wolfgang > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=g cc&pr=5620