public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: c++/8821: gcc 3.2 problem with overloaded inherited operator Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 07:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20021211151605.22563.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR c++/8821; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu> Cc: andre@kiwisound.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8821: gcc 3.2 problem with overloaded inherited operator Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:15:11 +0000 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: >andre wrote >>In my opinion it IS a bug because the operator of the parent class has >>another argument. So the name resolution should detect the matching >>operator in the parent class as usual in C++. I think overloaded >>operators should behave like overloaded functions (where the same thing >>works!). please post such code. It should not behave how you describe. > Note the distinction I made between overloaded functions and overloaded > virtual functions. For some historical reason, a virtual function with a > different argument list hides a function with the same name in the base > class. This is not the case for non-virtual functions. I just don't know hm, yes it is the same. > how operators behave. That's the question here. I concede that the > behavior is confusing. First name lookup happens, once a name has been found, base classes are not searched. Then overload resolution happens then accessibility is checked This happens consistently regardless of virtuality or operatorness nathan -- Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC The voices in my head told me to say this nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-11 15:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-12-11 7:16 Nathan Sidwell [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2002-12-11 7:26 Wolfgang Bangerth 2002-12-11 1:42 reichelt 2002-12-10 14:28 bangerth 2002-12-05 5:06 andre
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20021211151605.22563.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=nathan@codesourcery.com \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).