From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14856 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2002 21:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14837 invoked by uid 61); 11 Dec 2002 21:56:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021211215601.14836.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: anders.blomdell@control.lth.se, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, anders.blomdell@control.lth.se, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6080: incorrect loop optimizations X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00664.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: incorrect loop optimizations State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 11 13:56:00 2002 State-Changed-Why: I could reproduce the behavior with gcc3.0.4, but it seems fixed with 3.2 where the assembler code for both functions is essentially the same and correct. Same applies to 3.3CVS. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6080