From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-26146-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1899 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2002 23:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1882 invoked by uid 71); 11 Dec 2002 23:46:02 -0000
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021211234602.1881.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: bootstrap/8146: gcc 3.2 miscompiles gcc 2.95.3
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00675.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/8146; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, hjl@gnu.org, prj@po.cwru.edu
Subject: Re: bootstrap/8146: gcc 3.2 miscompiles gcc 2.95.3
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:36:00 -0800

 On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:04:38PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
 > This PR is now fixed on the branch, but not in the mainline; I have just 
 > verified
 > that we still get the same failure.
 > 
 > Should HJ's patch be applied to the mainline as well?
 
 No.  A different patch was intended to fix this problem on
 mainline.
 
 
 r~