From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-26164-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13218 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2002 04:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13202 invoked by uid 71); 12 Dec 2002 04:06:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 20:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021212040601.13201.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Daniel Nilsson <dnilsson@sisoft.com>
Subject: Re: fortran/8904: Optimization problem in f77 code
Reply-To: Daniel Nilsson <dnilsson@sisoft.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00693.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR fortran/8904; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Daniel Nilsson <dnilsson@sisoft.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: fortran/8904: Optimization problem in f77 code
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:57:28 -0500

 Reporter address for this bug should be dnilsson@sisoft.com
 
 Another workaround for this problem is the add the -ffloat-store flag to 
 g77, this makes both -O1 and -O2 optimization produce the correct 
 results. This might point to where to problems lies.
 
 Daniel
 
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8904