From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15120 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2002 20:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15085 invoked by uid 61); 12 Dec 2002 20:44:55 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021212204455.15084.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, snyder@fnal.gov From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, snyder@fnal.gov, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/8848: [3.3 regression] bad code when optimizing (lifetime analysis pass?) X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00722.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.3 regression] bad code when optimizing (lifetime analysis pass?) Responsible-Changed-From-To: ebotcazou->rth Responsible-Changed-By: ebotcazou Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Dec 12 12:44:54 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2002-09/msg00584.html http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8848