From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-26197-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8695 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2002 22:16:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8639 invoked by uid 71); 12 Dec 2002 22:16:02 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 14:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021212221602.8635.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: debug/1621: Debugging with complex numbers
Reply-To: Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00726.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR debug/1621; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>,
   "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>, bangerth@dealii.org,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: debug/1621: Debugging with complex numbers
Date: 12 Dec 2002 17:08:08 -0500

 >Didn't you generate some 'R' entires for REAL_TYPE in the previous
 >patch?
 
 I added code to handle REAL_TYPE in the new dbxout_fptype_value function, but
 I am not calling this function for REAL_TYPE.  I am only calling it for
 COMPLEX_TYPE.  I added a comment that mentions this to the revised patch that
 I am testing now.
 
 Jim