From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31039 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 01:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31025 invoked by uid 71); 13 Dec 2002 01:46:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021213014602.31024.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Janis Johnson Subject: Re: c++/8906: [3.2/3.3 regression] segmentation fault when parsing nested-class definition Reply-To: Janis Johnson X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00730.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/8906; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Janis Johnson To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, wirawan0@softhome.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, jason@redhat.com Cc: Subject: Re: c++/8906: [3.2/3.3 regression] segmentation fault when parsing nested-class definition Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:40:03 -0800 The mainline regression reported in PR c++/8906 showed up starting with this patch, which might merely uncover an existing problem: >2002-07-10 Jason Merrill > > PR c++/6255 > * decl.c (lookup_name_real): Build a new TYPENAME_TYPE rather than > modifying the old one. I used the small test case that Wolfgang provided. The ICE occurs in the mainline, the 3.2 branch, 3.2.1, 3.2, and 3.1.1, but not 3.1. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8906