From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-26234-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21069 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 17:26:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21055 invoked by uid 71); 13 Dec 2002 17:26:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 09:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021213172601.21054.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: java/8899: gcj confused over local classes
Reply-To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00763.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR java/8899; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: gbenson@redhat.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/8899: gcj confused over local classes
Date: 13 Dec 2002 10:20:25 -0700

 >>>>> "Gary" == Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com> writes:
 
 Gary> Number:         8899
 Gary> Synopsis:       gcj confused over local classes
 
 Gary> | public class Test {
 Gary> |     public void func1() {
 Gary> | 	class Foo {
 Gary> | 	    Foo(int i) {
 Gary> | 	    }
 Gary> | 	}
 Gary> | 	Foo f = new Foo(1);
 Gary> |     }
 Gary> |     public void func2() {
 Gary> | 	class Foo {
 Gary> | 	    Foo(boolean b) {
 Gary> | 	    }
 Gary> | 	}
 Gary> |     }
 Gary> | }
 
 I looked at this last night.
 
 It turns out that gcj has no notion of scope for member classes.  It
 puts them all in a single list attached to the class.  So the problem
 is that basic required functionality is missing from gcj.
 
 Tom