From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9565 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2002 20:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9548 invoked by uid 71); 14 Dec 2002 20:56:02 -0000 Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021214205602.9547.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Zidlicky Subject: Re: c/7872: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9* Reply-To: Richard Zidlicky X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00802.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/7872; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Zidlicky To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c/7872: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9* Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:38:21 +0100 On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 03:45:46PM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > Synopsis: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9* > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 27 07:45:44 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > Richard, same here: I don't have an m68k so cannot check your problem. you can, the bugreport should have enough information to configure the cross-compiler and all the necessary input to test the problem on any architecture. > What happened to the patch you appended? I does not seem > to have been applied... Unfortunately untill now I have seen absolutely no response to this bugreport, thanks for looking at it. Quite possible my solution is not the correct or best one, I noticed the problem would also go away if m68k had CLASS_CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE defined. However the gcc docs describe this as something that should affect floating point only so I am not sure about this. Richard