From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11504 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2002 21:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11473 invoked by uid 71); 16 Dec 2002 21:06:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021216210601.11471.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/8889: g++ 3.2.1 (also 3.2 it) miscompile Qt Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00865.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/8889; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Felix von Leitner Cc: bangerth@dealii.org, , Subject: Re: c++/8889: g++ 3.2.1 (also 3.2 it) miscompile Qt Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:01:29 -0600 (CST) I'm giving up. > It should be a trivial exercise to try to reproduce my problem. > [...] > > > On my system, these libraries all contain no C++ symbols, > > except libstdc++, of course, but you should repeat this > > with the executables/libraries that fail for you. > > No, I shouldn't. > These are no obscure projects from some Joe Schmoe. I used standard > packages and default flags. It ought to be a matter of seconds to find > someone in the gcc team who compiled these packages with the current > gcc. > [...] > > And before someone asks: no, I am not overclocking my machine. > I am not using unstable or CVS versions of anything. > I just want to run a system using the latest version of each of the > major packages, including binutils, gcc, glibc and Qt. That ought to be > possible, right? I mean, come on, Qt is the most important C++ project! > For many people it is the only reason to install C++ support at all! > > Are you telling me that noone has compiled Qt with the current gcc and > binutils yet? I'm not telling you anything except for this: gcc is in most part a volunteer project. Nobody's paying me for the work, and you can't force me to do something. If you don't want to cooperate and try to provide more information, that's fine with me, but don't insult me. It's not reasonable to ask me to build Qt+KDE with a new compiler just to experience "that it does not work". We need more information to figure out what goes wrong. If you don't want to provide it -- fine. I leave this report in feedback state. This way either someone else will look at it, or someone (possibly me) will close it in 3 months time since no reasonable feedback is forthcoming. Regards Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth