From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5408 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2002 01:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5388 invoked by uid 71); 17 Dec 2002 01:06:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021217010602.5387.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Felix von Leitner Subject: Re: c++/8889: g++ 3.2.1 (also 3.2 it) miscompile Qt Reply-To: Felix von Leitner X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00887.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/8889; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Felix von Leitner To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/8889: g++ 3.2.1 (also 3.2 it) miscompile Qt Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:57:15 +0100 Thus spake bangerth@dealii.org (bangerth@dealii.org): > State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 16 16:08:37 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > I refuse to work on PRs where I am discriminated against > for my nationality (which the reporter mistakenly assumed > to be different from his own), and I think that in general > gcc is not the place for insult. I made a bug report and you refuse to even make a feeble attempt to reproduce it. Instead you first claim that it's an ABI problem (which is not and I wrote that), then you claim you need more information (you don't, I included everything that is necessary to reproduce the problem) and then you claim that I withhold necessary information. As if this travesty is not enough, now you feel discriminated against? Is nobody here interested in whether the latest gcc release actually miscompiles the most widely used C++ toolkit (Qt) on the most widely used gcc platform (x86-linux) using the recommended flags? What is the bug report form good for, then? Is this a technical bug tracking and removal instrument or the personal playground of some "I don't have the time to try to reproduce your bug, but maybe you could try running ldd again" weenies? Sheesh. I could care less whether Mr bangerth here has the time to try and reproduce my bug report. But I do care whether he sabotages gcc by closing open bugs he did not even try to reproduce! Felix