From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22500 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2002 01:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22484 invoked by uid 71); 17 Dec 2002 01:36:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021217013601.22483.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Janis Johnson Subject: Re: c++/8702: [3.3 regression] matching of conversion operators Reply-To: Janis Johnson X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00889.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/8702; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Janis Johnson To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@gcc.gnu.org, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/8702: [3.3 regression] matching of conversion operators Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:29:30 -0800 The regression reported in PR c++/8702 showed up starting with this patch: 2002-03-16 Nathan Sidwell PR c++/4361 * cp-tree.h * call.c * class.c * lex.c * mangle.c * pt.c * search.c * typeck.c I used the test case that Wolfgang provided earlier in this PR. Output from the compiler: 8702.C:12: error: no `C2::operator C1()' member function declared in class `C2' 8702.C:12: error: template definition of non-template `C2::operator C1()' http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8702