From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16418 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2002 15:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16386 invoked by uid 61); 18 Dec 2002 15:17:12 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021218151712.16384.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: dean@foster.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de Reply-To: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de, dean@foster.net, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/8982: "using foo::operator+" doesn't parse X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00929.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: "using foo::operator+" doesn't parse State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: reichelt State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 18 07:17:08 2002 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. Gaby's comment on this (which accidentally ended up as PR 8983): > This is a known bug -- there already duplicate reports > for this and proposed patch. And, we'll have the new parser (soon). http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8982