From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 410 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2002 16:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 372 invoked by uid 71); 19 Dec 2002 16:46:04 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021219164604.366.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Arto Nirkko" Subject: Re: optimization/6193: [Sparc Solaris2.6] -funroll-loops leads to bootstrap failure in gcc-3.0.4 Reply-To: "Arto Nirkko" X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01027.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6193; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Arto Nirkko" To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, arto.nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/6193: [Sparc Solaris2.6] -funroll-loops leads to bootstrap failure in gcc-3.0.4 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:44:46 +0100 (MET) Hi bug 5888 and 6193 seem resolved since gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.1.1, as reported (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-05/msg02737.html). About a month ago, you already asked the same question, and as a result closed 5888 (see correspondence included below). As mentioned in bug 6193, this was a duplicate of 5888, which I had to re-submit because of more information available (i.e. responsibility of -funroll-loops), since I could't add additional info to bug 5888 in gnatsweb (by the way, on other bug-sites, i can add additional comments at least for bugs submitted by myself... ;-) Have not tested gcc-3.2 yet, though (but since 3.1 works and hopefully there's no regression...) Thanks for the query anyway, and good luck Arto > From anonymous@sources.redhat.com Thu Dec 19 17:21:23 2002 > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:08:57 +0000 > From: bangerth@dealii.org > Subject: Re: optimization/6193: [Sparc Solaris2.6] -funroll-loops leads to > bootstrap failure in gcc-3.0.4 > To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, arto.nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch, > nobody@gcc.gnu.org > Reply-to: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, > arto.nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org > > Old Synopsis: -funroll-loops leads to bootstrap failure in gcc-3.0.4 > New Synopsis: [Sparc Solaris2.6] -funroll-loops leads to bootstrap failure in gcc-3.0.4 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Thu Dec 19 08:08:56 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > The 3.0 branch has been discontinued. Do you know whether > this works now for gcc3.2 or 3.2.1? > > Thanks > Wolfgang > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6193 > --------------old emails--------------- Old Synopsis: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4 New Synopsis: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 20 17:57:38 2002 State-Changed-Why: This is a rather old bootstrap failure. Can you please check whether this still happens with newer versions of gcc and report back to us what you find? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5888 --------------------------------------- Subject: Re: bootstrap/5888: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4 To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org Message-id: <0H5Y00803W4MYK@ubecx01.unibe.ch> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Lines: 41 Hi no, it doesn't happen anymore with 3.1 and 3.1.1 (and I have reported it :-) see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-05/msg02737.html). However, I wish to recall my other suggestion again: with "gcc -v", the compiler flags used for the bootstrap should be reported together with the other configuration parameters. This would not only be useful as a requirement for bug reporting, but also in "real life" when identifying a particular compiler build. Example: I once for test purposes bootstrapped with -ffast-math, which naturally leads to certain floating point anomalies in programs compiled with the resulting compiler. Somehow, I forgot and actually used that compiler, leading to errors very difficult to debug, especially since gcc -v didn't show anything wrong. Also, bootstrapping options like -O3 -mcpu=ultra etc. might be relevent when transporting the build to another machine (pre-ultrasparc, for example). Please let gcc -v report ALL relevant configuration parameters, including bootstrapping options! Arto ------------------------------------------ From: bangerth@dealii.org Subject: Re: bootstrap/5888: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4 To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, arto.nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Reply-to: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, arto.nirkko@dkf6.unibe.ch, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Message-id: <20021122150954.28593.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Synopsis: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4 State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 22 07:09:52 2002 State-Changed-Why: Reportedly works now. Regarding your other suggestion about printing flags on -v, please open a new report. Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5888 -------------------------------------------