From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6324 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2002 02:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6304 invoked by uid 61); 20 Dec 2002 02:45:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021220024523.6303.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: aoliva@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, aoliva@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/7221: wrong linkage in member functions of typedef-named classes X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01062.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: wrong linkage in member functions of typedef-named classes State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Thu Dec 19 18:45:21 2002 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. Since 3.0, the symbols's name is at least correctly named S::f, but it still has internal linkage as of today. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7221