From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4449 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2002 04:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4435 invoked by uid 71); 20 Dec 2002 04:06:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021220040603.4434.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Alexander Kabaev Subject: Re: c++/6467: Wrong interactions between sjlj-exceptions and inline functions in GCC 2.95.3 on FreeBSD Reply-To: Alexander Kabaev X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01069.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6467; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Kabaev To: ak03@gte.com Cc: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/6467: Wrong interactions between sjlj-exceptions and inline functions in GCC 2.95.3 on FreeBSD Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:04:20 -0500 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:53:14 -0500 Alexander Kabaev wrote: > These bugs have been dealt with a long time ago. This PR should be > closed. Sorry, I need to expand on that little. The problems are still there on gcc-2.95-branch, but the whole integrate has been rewritten for GCC 3.x, so they do not happen with recent compiler versions. I submitted this PRs initially to help people who might still use GCC 2.95.x in production environment. FreeBSD 4.x users, for example. Meanwhile FreeBSD has applied these fixes locally, so whether this patch will ever make it into official FSF repository is irrelevant. -- Alexander Kabaev