From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10445 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2002 17:06:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10418 invoked by uid 61); 20 Dec 2002 17:06:56 -0000 Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021220170656.10417.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@gcc.gnu.org, jason@redhat.com, jrheath@ca.ibm.com, jsm28@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@gcc.gnu.org, jason@redhat.com, jrheath@ca.ibm.com, jsm28@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/7748: Static objects in dynamic library with non-default priority not initialized X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01107.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Static objects in dynamic library with non-default priority not initialized Responsible-Changed-From-To: jsm28->jason Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Dec 20 09:06:56 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Joseph says that he's not responsible. The initial code seems to have come from Jason. Jason, is this right? It's about supporting variable initializer priority in calling static constructors. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7748