From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-26647-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29822 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2002 16:46:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29803 invoked by uid 71); 21 Dec 2002 16:46:01 -0000
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021221164601.29802.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
Subject: Re: c/8960: [3.2/3.3 regression] Segfault with __attribute__ ((mode (...))) in start_function:5702
Reply-To: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01176.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/8960; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/8960: [3.2/3.3 regression] Segfault with __attribute__ ((mode (...))) in start_function:5702
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:43:15 +0100

 On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 04:36:06AM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: [3.2/3.3 regression] Segfault with __attribute__ ((mode (...))) in start_function:5702
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 20 20:36:05 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     I can confirm the crash. However, the code does also crash
 >     2.95 for me:
 >     tmp/g> gcc -c x.c
 >     x.c:2: Internal compiler error in `layout_decl', at stor-layout.c:262
 >     Please submit a full bug report.
 >     See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
 >     
 >     So this would not qualify as a regression. Christian, could
 >     you double check what your results are with 2.95 on your
 >     two platforms?
 
 Ooops. One shouldn't change test cases in the very last minute :-(
 
 __attribute__ ((mode (TI))) int f (void) { }
 
 (note TI instead of SI) indead crashes on 3.2/3.3 as described and
 issues an error with 2.95.3 on sparc:
 
 7227-2.c:2: no data type for mode `TI'
 
 However, this testcase results in an error with all gcc Versions on i386.
 
     regards  Christian
 
 -- 
 THAT'S ALL FOLKS!