From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-26664-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32335 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2002 18:16:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32245 invoked by uid 71); 21 Dec 2002 18:16:01 -0000
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021221181601.32235.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c/8962: "-O2 -mmmx" makes gcc seg fault
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01193.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/8962; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: Mack Lobell <macklobell@hotmail.com>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c/8962: "-O2 -mmmx" makes gcc seg fault
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 12:15:17 -0600 (CST)

 > Conclusion:
 > The bug exists only in 3.3 branch.
 > 
 > Does that help?
 
 Yes, that's very valuable information. I marked it as a regression, since 
 it worked with 3.2.
 
 So the only thing we're now missing is a small testcase :-)
 
 Thanks
   Wolfgang
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:           bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth