From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17807 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2002 07:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17787 invoked by uid 71); 22 Dec 2002 07:06:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021222070601.17785.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Geoff Keating Subject: Re: other/4520: cselib.c hash_rtx incorrectly hashes based on rtx address Reply-To: Geoff Keating X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01217.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/4520; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Geoff Keating To: dje@watson.ibm.com Cc: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, john@feith.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/4520: cselib.c hash_rtx incorrectly hashes based on rtx address Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:56:59 -0800 > Cc: Geoff Keating > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:22:13 -0500 > From: David Edelsohn > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2002 18:22:33.0209 (UTC) FILETIME=[EE029E90:01C2A91D] > > >>>>> bangerth writes: > > Wolfgang> David, you probably have more insight into these things than > Wolfgang> me, but I know that some of these address-hashing things > Wolfgang> have been purged. Is this particular report still valid? > > As far as I can tell, the incorrect hashing of addresses of > LABEL_REFS and SYMBOL_REFS in cselib.c:hash_rtx() has not been corrected. > The failure is dormant, but I am not sure how it affects PCH restore > state. cselib.c isn't active when PCH files are saved, so nothing in cselib.c affects PCH. -- - Geoffrey Keating