Re: middle-end/3973: GCC fails to bootstrap with 80+160MB memory / optimization

[Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>]

The following reply was made to PR middle-end/3973; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: middle-end/3973: GCC fails to bootstrap with 80+160MB memory /
 optimization
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:53:41 +0100 (CET)

 On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 >     Gerald, I hate to step on your toes, but I guess there is
 >     not much that can be done about this report -- newer gccs
 >     do more optimization, and they need more memory and compile
 >     time. Do you agree that there are probably better testcases
 >     for this kind of problem in the database?
 
 Well.  This testcase would have been "self contained" (in that GCC
 itself is the testcase) and it *is* a clear regression, but given the
 current trend, what can we realistically do about it?
 
 (I find it a bit disturbing that several old PRs of mine which
 describe clear performance regressions are getting closed these
 days without any form of resolution, but let's assume there are
 other, better(?) PRs for this problem in our database.)
 
 Gerald