From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18061 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2002 06:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18047 invoked by uid 71); 28 Dec 2002 06:16:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021228061601.18046.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathanael Nerode Subject: Re: other/931: VMS support looks bitrotten Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01334.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/931; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathanael Nerode To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: other/931: VMS support looks bitrotten Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 01:10:26 -0500 VAX/VMS support in GCC has officially been dropped and its files removed. Alpha/OpenVMS support is OK and uses the Unix build procedure. What's left are the following: gcc.hlp: Should this be updated? Deleted? What? vms.texi: This is more up to date than it used to be, but an Alpha/OpenVMS maintainer still needs to go through it to make it accurate. install-old.texi: Still-relevant parts of this (if there are any) need to be migrated into install.texi. This shouldn't be too hard overall, but it can only be done by an OpenVMS person, 'cause they're the only ones who know what to do. Perhaps it could be assigned to some such person? :-) --Nathanael