From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13698 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2002 16:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13683 invoked by uid 71); 29 Dec 2002 16:46:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 08:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20021229164601.13682.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij Subject: Re: c++/5930: Incorrect access control checking on static data members Reply-To: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01378.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5930; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org, adc@ee.port.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5930: Incorrect access control checking on static data members Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 23:48:12 +0700 I will add a testcase from PR2739 which is the exact same problem just for sure. --Kriang Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org writes: > >| Synopsis: Incorrect access control checking on static data members >| >| State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed >| State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa >| State-Changed-When: Sun Dec 29 08:14:40 2002 >| State-Changed-Why: >| Fixed in the main trunk after parser merge. > >Hi, > > Is there an existing testcase for this bug? If not, a new testcase >should be submitted. > >Thanks. > >-- Gaby > > >